De Novo Archive
De Novo is the newest addition to the Minnesota Law Review family. The blog serves as a forum through which the staff, editors, and alumni of the Minnesota Law Review can contribute to legal thought and academic debate.
CARPENTER V. MURPHY: A REEXAMINATION OF THE CREEK NATION IN OKLAHOMA
By: Aron Mozes, Volume 104 Staff Member The pending Supreme Court case Carpenter v. Murphy[i] presents an intersection of the history, laws, and legislative actions surrounding the Creek Nation in Oklahoma, as well as a broader re-examination of the relationship between Native American tribes and the federal government. The case considers whether the 1866 territorial…
Continue ReadingNO LEG TO STAND ON: HOW THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT IMPROPERLY RESTRICTED THE APPLICATION OF THE COMPETITOR STANDING DOCTRINE TO PATENT CHALLENGERS WHEN ESTABLISHING ARTICLE III STANDING UPON APPEALING AN INTER PARTES REVIEW
By: Ryan Fitzgerald, Volume 104 Staff Member The Federal Circuit’s recent holding in General Electric Co. v United Technologies Corp.[i] increases the difficulty for competitors to challenge the validity of a patent in court after an adverse inter partes review (IPR) decision.[ii] An IPR allows any person or institution to challenge the validity of a…
Continue ReadingA REGULATORY FUMBLE: THE CHANGING REGULATORY SCHEME SURROUNDING GAMBLING AND DAILY FANTASY SPORTS
By: Paul Strey, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION On September 26, 2019, the National Football League formally announced that DraftKings would be the official daily fantasy provider for professional football.[1] The partnership allows DraftKings to use the official NFL logo, special highlight reels, and the NFL’s NextGen statistics program.[2] This endorsement represents the first time…
Continue ReadingSEVENTH CIRCUIT’S LEGAL PRUDISHNESS: INCORRECT DECISION IN TRAN CREATES A SPLIT
By: Zach Wright, Volume 104 Staff Member The Seventh Circuit decided Tran v. Minnesota Life Ins. Co. (“Tran”) in April of 2019.[I] Tran stemmed from a beneficiary’s claim for benefits under an ERISA-governed life insurance policy after their spouse died engaging in autoerotic asphyxiation.[ii] The court held that a reasonable person would conclude death by autoerotic asphyxiation…
Continue ReadingCITIES ARE TURNING ON CONVERSION THERAPY BANS
By: Melanie Griffith, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION The tides are turning on the trend of conversion therapy bans. Conversion therapy is a controversial practice that purports to “cure” homosexual or transgender individuals by attempting to change their sexual orientation or gender identity.[1] Therapists use methods ranging from aversion therapy and shock therapy to seemingly-benign…
Continue ReadingBLOCKING THE SUNSHINE: SUPREME COURT LIMITS ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT RECORDS IN FOOD MARKETING INSTITUTE V. ARGUS LEADER MEDIA
By: Chuqiao Yu, Volume 104 Staff Member Imagine you, as a taxpayer, wanted to know how your hard-earned money had been used and filed a request to a federal agency asking for some information about a commercial program it was administering. The agency declined your request and explained to you that the information you requested…
Continue ReadingNO TOLL FOR THE TAXPAYER: FINANCIAL DISABILITY, STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS REFUND TOLLING, AND COURTS’ STRICT APPLICATION OF “AUTHORITY”
By: Casey Epstein, Volume 104 Staff Member INTRODUCTION Imagine you are poor, mentally-ill, and struggle to manage your finances. You granted your adult son durable power of attorney (“DPA”),[1] but are no longer on speaking terms with him. You work a low-wage, menial job and your paychecks are subject to typical tax withholdings. Because of…
Continue ReadingThe Law Review Appears on NPR’s Planet Money
Law Review Editor Thomas Hansfield appeared on NPR‘s Planet Money podcast to discuss his Minnesota Law Review article about in-game video game purchases and whether or not they fit the legal definition of gambling. Listen to the podcast episode here.
Continue ReadingJudicial Attire: An Alteration to “Under the Robes”
By: Erik M. Jensen* In 2009, the GreenBag, which (with justification) bills itself as An Entertaining Journal of Law, published my revealing essay on judicial attire—or, more precisely, on what is hidden by judicial attire[i]—Under the Robes: A Judicial Right to Bare Arms and Legs and . . .?[ii] Along the way I hypothesized that, because a judicial…
Continue ReadingAnother NCAA Upset: Rethinking the Playbook for Compensating Student-Athletes
March introduced a new kind of madness into collegiate athletics this year. Just as the regular basketball season came to a close and players geared up for the annual all-around tournaments, a ruling issued from the Northern District of California that further blurred the line between amateur and professional sports.
Continue Reading