By: Caleb Johnson, Volume 106 Staff Member On December 6th, 2021, a New Jersey Superior Court announced in Merck & Co., Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Company that insurance companies could not use a hostilities/war exclusion to deny coverage to biopharmaceutical company Merck’s claim after falling victim to the NotPetya cyberattack.[1] The court focused its…

By: Jackie Cuellar, Volume 106 Staff Member To alleviate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the United States’ economy, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA).[1] Section 1005 of the ARPA, also referred to as the Emergency Relief for Farmers of Color Act, is a historic provision that allocates $4 billion…

By: Nick Penn, Volume 106 Staff Member  In 2019, the Supreme Court of Delaware put the boardrooms of Delaware corporations on notice with its denial of Blue Bell Creameries’ motion to dismiss a shareholder derivative suit for breach of the board’s duty of oversight.[1] The duty of oversight, a subsidiary of the duty of loyalty,…

By: Calvin Lee, Volume 106 Staff Member Sovereign Citizens: a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma. The once-isolated political sect has ballooned to over 300,000 followers, and the rapid proliferation of their pseudo-legal ideologies is severely compromising court efficiency.[1] Sovereign Citizens’ abject refusal to stipulate to even the most basic tenets of the…

By: Adler Pierce, Volume 106 Staff Member An amateur, as defined by the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), “is someone who does not have a written or verbal agreement with an agent, has not profited above his/her actual and necessary expenses or gained a competitive advantage in his/her sport.”[1] The concept of “amateurism” has been…

By: Marine Loison, Volume 106 Staff Member I. INTRODUCTION The Sackler name has been synonymous with the opioid crisis in the United States. Now, it has also become a household name in Bankruptcy Court.[1] On December 16th, 2021, Judge McMahon answered the “great unsettled question” of Bankruptcy Court’s statutory authorization by granting non-consensual release of third-party…

By: Kaylyn Stanek, Volume 106 Staff Member A primary justification for the U.S. consumer bankruptcy system is giving debtors a fresh start.[1] Although one might assume an individual must exchange all of their assets in exchange for moving forward, this is not true. The Bankruptcy Code[2] and Minnesota law[3] provide “exemptions” that curb a creditor’s…

By: Xiaoyuan Zhou, Volume 106 Staff Member On January 19, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in Nancy Huisha-Huisha v. Alejandro Mayorkas.[1] The case is about whether the public health laws under 42 U.S.C. § 265, often referred to as the “Title 42 Policy,” grant the Center of Disease…

By: Zach Robole, Volume 106 Staff Member The inability of our legislatures to keep up with the boom of Internet technology has forced a conversation about privacy to the forefront of American discourse.[1] Unfortunately, even when state or federal legislatures do attempt to regulate a new technology to protect privacy rights, their solutions often contain…

By: Ayesha Mitha, Volume 106 Staff Member On January 13, 2022, the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for large employers. The decision put the ETS on hold indefinitely.[1] Among other things, the ETS mandated that all businesses with 100 or more…