De Novo Archive
De Novo is the newest addition to the Minnesota Law Review family. The blog serves as a forum through which the staff, editors, and alumni of the Minnesota Law Review can contribute to legal thought and academic debate.
IT’S COLDER DAY BY DAY: ADOPTING A WINTER EVICTION MORATORIUM IN MINNESOTA
By Daniel Suitor, Volume 105 Staff Member, Volume 106 Lead Symposium Editor INTRODUCTION Missing your rent payment shouldn’t be a death sentence, but it could be in Minnesota. An eviction occurring during the coldest months of the winter could put a family out on the street in temperatures below 0°F.[1] This Post argues that the…
Continue ReadingPEOPLE OVER PROFITS: HOW MINNESOTA TOOK ON BIG PHARMA TO TACKLE THE INSULIN AFFORDABILITY CRISIS
By: Hannah Oliason, Volume 105 Staff Member Every cell, tissue, and organ in your body depends on water to survive.[1] But imagine a scenario in which your water bill cost upwards of $300 per month. In addition, your water quality must be tested daily which costs you $200 per month. Lastly, to maintain the water…
Continue ReadingROBINHOOD’S GOAL IS NOT TO ‘DEMOCRATIZE FINANCE FOR ALL’: DON’T EXPECT GAMESTOP BUYERS’ LAWSUITS TO CHANGE THAT
By: Daniel Raddenbach, Volume 105 Staff Member INTRODUCTION Robinhood, an investment app designed to make trading easy for small investors,[1] caught national attention in January when hordes of its users banded together to defeat hedge funds[2] who were actively profiting from the decline of the value of GameStop stock.[3] Robinhood’s decision to temporarily halt…
Continue ReadingWHY DOES THE UNITED STATES FAIL TO ADDRESS THE GREEN SUKUK AS AN IDEAL VEHICLE FOR ENVIRONMENT-FORWARD PROJECTS?
By: Sarah Snebold, Volume 105 Staff Member Within a globalized economy, it would be foolish to turn a blind eye to Islamic finance and its respective market. Islamic finance presents the ability to tap into emerging markets within the Middle East, Africa and Asia.[1] Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley profited by entering these markets, evidenced…
Continue ReadingA GALAXY NOT SO FAR AWAY: THE STATES STRIKE BACK AT BIG TECH OVER GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK’S ALLEGED “JEDI BLUE” PRICE-FIXING SCHEME
By: Avery Bennett, Volume 105 Staff Member INTRODUCTION Recently, mounting scrutiny and criticism of technology companies’ business practices have led to well publicized calls for investigations and probes into potentially anticompetitive behavior.[1] Amid these calls to curb the industry’s power, state officials have revealed a coordinated effort to contain anticompetitive practices by technology companies,[2] particularly…
Continue ReadingPRESERVING THE E-MARKET OF IDEAS: HOW A NARROW “RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN” EXCEPTION TO SECTION 230 CAN COMBAT DIGITAL HARASSMENT WITHOUT DECIMATING DIGITAL DISCOURSE
By: Jordan Francis, Volume 105 Staff Member Depending on who you ask, we have either handed the levers of public discourse over to the maleficent interests of “Big Tech,” thereby making the Mark Zuckerbergs of the world the arbiters of truth and justice, or we have abandoned all control and given misinformation and hate speech…
Continue ReadingPATENT PLEDGING PROBLEMS: THE OPEN COVID PLEDGE AND LONG-TERM SOLUTIONS TO LICENSING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN GLOBAL EMERGENCIES
By: Marra Clay, Volume 105 Staff Member The American intellectual property system has a single primary goal: to encourage creators to make new things that benefit society in exchange for an exclusive right to use and license the creation for a limited time.[1] The United States government currently lacks authority to mandate most intellectual property…
Continue ReadingA POLL TAX BY ANY OTHER NAME: HOW THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN UPHOLDING FLORIDA’S PAY-TO-VOTE REQUIREMENT AND WHAT COMES NEXT
By: Dina Kostrow, Volume 105 Staff Member Until recently, Florida was one of only a few states in which citizens convicted of a felony permanently lost the right to vote.[1] In 2018, it looked like the tide was turning. A 64.55% super-majority of Florida voters approved Amendment 4, which restored the right to vote for…
Continue ReadingCRUEL AND UNUSUAL: THE SUPREME COURT’S FAILURE TO PROTECT DEATH ROW PRISONERS DURING THE GOVERNMENT’S RECENT RUSH OF EXECUTIONS
By: Julia Potach, Volume 105 Staff Member On July 14, 2020, the federal government executed death row prisoner, Daniel Lewis Lee, and carried out its first federal execution in 17 years.[1] One year earlier, former Attorney General William Barr cleared the way for the government to resume executions when he directed the Federal Bureau of…
Continue ReadingRITTMANN V. AMAZON.COM: A WRONG TURN FOR GIG WORKERS LOOKING FOR CLARITY IN THE FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT
By Zach Krenz, Volume 105 Staffer The Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) makes arbitration clauses enforceable. Section 2, which outlines the breadth of the Act, states that arbitration provisions in contracts “involving commerce . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable. . . .”[1] Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act exempts certain categories of…
Continue Reading