Articles, Essays, & Tributes
Rescinding Rights
Renewable Energy Federalism
The Costs of the Punishment Clause
Antitrust, Attention, and the Mental Health Crisis
Inheriting Privilege
Remembrance of and Tribute to Walter F. Mondale
Notes
Too Hot to Handle?: Native Advertising and the Firestone Dilemma
Designer Minor: Creating a Better Legal Regime for Pediatric Cosmetic Procedures
Headnotes
Racial Bias in Algorithmic IP
Introduction to The Bremer-Kovacs Collection: Historic Documents Related to the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 (HeinOnline 2021)
Sprinting a Marathon: Next Steps for Gender Equity in Criminal Law Employment
Fighting Orthodoxy: Challenging Critical Race Theory Bans and Supporting Critical Thinking in Schools
Me, Myself, and My Digital Double: Extending Sara Greene’s Stealing (Identity) From the Poor to the Challenges of Identity Verification
K Is for Contract―Why Is It, Though? A K’s Study on the Origins, Persistence and Propagation of Legal Konventions
Chilling Effects and Unequal Subjects: A Response to Jonathon Penney’s Understanding Chilling Effects
De Novo Blog
By: Marine Loison, Volume 106 Staff Member I. INTRODUCTION The Sackler name has been synonymous with the opioid crisis in the United States. Now, it has also become a household name in Bankruptcy Court.[1] On December 16th, 2021, Judge McMahon answered the “great unsettled question” of Bankruptcy Court’s statutory authorization by granting non-consensual release of third-party…
By: Kaylyn Stanek, Volume 106 Staff Member A primary justification for the U.S. consumer bankruptcy system is giving debtors a fresh start.[1] Although one might assume an individual must exchange all of their assets in exchange for moving forward, this is not true. The Bankruptcy Code[2] and Minnesota law[3] provide “exemptions” that curb a creditor’s…
By: Xiaoyuan Zhou, Volume 106 Staff Member On January 19, 2022, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in Nancy Huisha-Huisha v. Alejandro Mayorkas.[1] The case is about whether the public health laws under 42 U.S.C. § 265, often referred to as the “Title 42 Policy,” grant the Center of Disease…
By: Zach Robole, Volume 106 Staff Member The inability of our legislatures to keep up with the boom of Internet technology has forced a conversation about privacy to the forefront of American discourse.[1] Unfortunately, even when state or federal legislatures do attempt to regulate a new technology to protect privacy rights, their solutions often contain…
By: Ayesha Mitha, Volume 106 Staff Member On January 13, 2022, the United States Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for large employers. The decision put the ETS on hold indefinitely.[1] Among other things, the ETS mandated that all businesses with 100 or more…